Commentary: Obama must keep promise on better airport security

The Rock Hill HeraldJanuary 7, 2010 

The failure of U.S. officials at several levels to connect the dots leading to Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the so-called underwear bomber, was alarming. But the close call at least provides an incentive and an opportunity to review airport security procedures from top to bottom.

"This was a screw-up that could have been disastrous," President Obama reportedly told a gathering of top administration officials Tuesday. "We dodged a bullet, but just barely. It was averted by brave individuals, not because the system worked — and that is not acceptable."

Later, the president outlined reviews he has ordered of airline screening procedures and U.S. intelligence. He added that new security measures would be announced in coming days.

Obama also conceded that even more "red flags" regarding Abdulmutallab had been reported than initially acknowledged but that "it is increasingly clear that intelligence was not fully analyzed or fully leveraged." The president said he could not tolerate that.

It is reassuring, at least, that the red flags went up. The failure to tag Abdulmutallab as an aspiring terrorist was more the result of human error than a systemic breakdown of the intelligence apparatus. The intelligence was there, according to the administration, but people in key positions failed to utilize it.

In any case, it is chilling to consider how close Abdulmutallab came to bringing down an airliner over Detroit with 300 people aboard. In the end, luck and fast-acting passengers saved the day.

To read the complete editorial, visit The Rock Hill Herald.

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service