Goldman Sachs' response to latest McClatchy article

McClatchy NewspapersDecember 31, 2009 

  • Lost money on a CDO or mortgage-backed securities marketed by Goldman Sachs or others? Know an investor or organization that has? Email us in total confidence at

Goldman Sachs' chief spokesman, Lucas van Praag, issued the following statement in response to the latest installment in Greg Gordon's investigative series on the Wall Street firm, "Investors only could lose in Goldman's Caymans deals," published on Dec. 30:

"The McClatchy story on synthetic CDOs is riddled with factual inaccuracies and lacks a fundamental understanding of the instruments, the market conditions at the time and the intent of investors entering into the trades. There is nothing to be taken away from the story other than the fact that reporter fails to comprehend the subject matter."

Van Praag added: "Mr. Gordon appears to have been inspired by a New York Times story on synthetic CDOs that was published on December 24."

McClatchy stands by its reporting, and rejects as untrue Mr. Van Praag's allegations that the story "is riddled with factual inaccuracies" and that the reporter "fails to comprehend the subject matter."

As flattering as it is, Mr. van Praag's assumption that Greg Gordon produced his Dec. 30 story in six days is incorrect. In fact, he had finished reporting and writing the story, and it was being edited on Dec. 24 when The New York Times published "Banks Bundled Bad Debt, Bet Against It and Won," that paper's variation on the theme of McClatchy's Nov. 1-4 series on how Goldman Sachs had bundled bad debt, bet against it and won.


Investors only could lose in Goldman's Caymans deals

How billions in complex Goldman deals escaped scrutiny

Details of one Goldman deal reveal lopsided conflicts

See McClatchy's special report on Goldman Sachs

McClatchy Newspapers 2009

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service