Details of one Goldman deal reveal lopsided conflicts

McClatchy NewspapersDecember 30, 2009 

  • Lost money on a CDO or mortgage-backed securities marketed by Goldman Sachs or others? Know an investor or organization that has? Email us in total confidence at

NEW YORK — Some banks were only too happy to take big bets from Goldman against the housing market.

Merrill Lynch, the biggest player in the offshore market, remained bullish on the subprime mortgage market until late 2007 and plunged $369 million into a deal that Goldman assembled in 2006 in the name of a newly created Cayman Islands-based company, Broadwick Funding Ltd.

The mortgage-backed securities that were part of the $720 million Broadwick credit-default swap arrangement with Goldman were riskier than $280 million in bonds that also were sold to the investors in another part of the deal. Experts say that Goldman likely paid less than $100,000 a year for what initially was $720 million in insurance against a default or some other "credit event."

Despite Goldman's disclaimers in an offering circular that McClatchy obtained, the transaction was tainted by "a potentially huge conflict of interest" that "cannot be addressed by standard prospectus disclosures," said New York bond analyst Sylvain Raynes.

"This is not an arms-length situation, as brokering always pretends to be," said Raynes, the co-author of the forthcoming book "The Elements of Structured Finance," to be published in March by the Oxford University Press. "Goldman can easily and selectively sell the riskiest securities into the deal with no oversight from anyone."

Indeed, he said, Goldman could even select the worst imaginable loans and "collect 100 cents on the dollar."

Merrill Lynch recently joined a court fight against Goldman over $10 million of Broadwick's cash reserves, but neither side has revealed how much Goldman has collected so far under the swap agreement.

In a similar deal, known as Fortius I Funding Ltd., Goldman advertised that 86 percent of a $601 million package, or $517 million, would comprise a credit-default swap that would hinge mainly on the performance of residential mortgages yet to be identified.


How Goldman secretly bet on the U.S. housing crash

Goldman takes on new role: taking away people's homes

Goldman left foreign investors holding the subprime bag

Why did blue-chip Goldman take a walk on subprime's wild side?

Goldman's chief executive apologizes for part in fiscal crisis

Under fire, Goldman scraps cash bonuses for executives

Goldman Sachs chief will face bipartisan financial crisis panel

How Moody's sold its ratings and sold out investors

McClatchy Newspapers 2009

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service