• Posted on Thursday, December 10, 2009
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

Commentary: Closing in on a shield law

Sign up for email newsletters now!

Sign up for email newsletters now!

Never miss a McClatchy story

The American public often finds out about what government and other power brokers are doing through a free press.

Here's just one example. Rhode Island reporter Jim Taricani in 2005 dug up an FBI videotape showing a top aide to the mayor accepting a bribe. He played an important role in exposing this corruption.

There's a catch, however. The reporter was sentenced by a judge for refusing to reveal who gave him the tape.

To unveil the cloak of secrecy and uncover abuses of power, news gatherers often depend on individuals coming forward with information – whistle-blowers, leakers, call them what you will – who expect the press to protect their identity. Further, the public expects news gatherers to act independently, not as an arm of government.

That's why most states, including California, have laws that recognize that protecting reporters' sources serves the public interest, even when it makes government exhaust all reasonable alternatives for turning up information before turning to the press as a surrogate investigative arm.

There is no law at the national level, however.

To read the complete editorial, visit The Sacramento Bee.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

MORE COMMENTARY FROM MCCLATCHY