DEA reassigns pilot over refusal to go to Afghanistan

McClatchy NewspapersJuly 9, 2009 

US NEWS DEA MCT

In May, veteran DEA pilot Daniel Offield alleged in an employment discrimination complaint against the DEA that he was told if he refuses to go to Afghanistan in July he'll be demoted.

HANDOUT — MCT

WASHINGTON — The Drug Enforcement Administration has removed an agent from his pilot duties after he refused to be sent to Afghanistan on a 60 day-detail.

Veteran Agent Daniel Offield's reassignment from the Aviation Division came less than two weeks after McClatchy reported that some special-agent pilots said they're being forced illegally to go to a combat zone on temporary duty.

In interviews with McClatchy, more than a dozen DEA agents, including Offield, described a badly managed system in which some pilots had been sent to Afghanistan under duress or as punishment for bucking their superiors.

Offield, 47, alleges in an employment discrimination complaint that he was told if he refused to go to Afghanistan July 15 he'd be sent back to street duty. He's asked for a reprieve because he was in the process of adopting two special needs children. He offered to serve his required temporary duty in other countries.

On July 3, Offield, who lives in Stockton, Calif., was reassigned to street duty at the DEA's Oakland, Calif., office, his lawyer, Richard Margarita, said.

DEA officials say working in dangerous countries is part of a pilot's job, but many agents say service in a combat zone should be treated as voluntary because agents aren't military personnel.

DEA officials have denied discriminating against Offield and said that in such cases agents aren't being demoted, because even if they lose their pilot position, the salary is the same.

"This is not a punishment. He suffers no loss of pay or status as a result of the transfer, and he will not be required to go to Afghanistan," said Garrison K. Courtney, a DEA spokesman.

Margarita disagreed, noting that DEA pilots receive from $1,000 to $2,000 more a month in hazard pay.

"He's very disappointed in the agency that he has served for 25 years," Margarita said.

Such complaints, so far mostly arising from the Aviation Division, could complicate the Obama administration's efforts to send dozens of additional DEA agents to Afghanistan as part of a civilian and military personnel "surge" that aims to stabilize the country.

Two years ago, the State Department told U.S. diplomats that they might be forced to serve in Iraq in the largest call-up since Vietnam. The announcement triggered an outcry, but the department eventually found enough volunteers to fill the jobs.

Courtney said the DEA has no immediate plans to change its staffing practices in Afghanistan.

Offield, who oversaw marijuana eradication in California's national forests, alleges in his complaint that the agency's decision to send him to Afghanistan is part of a larger pattern of harassment based on his age and sexual orientation.

Offield said the harassment began soon after he told a colleague that he's gay.

The retaliation, he said, became worse after he appeared on MSNBC, where he told reporters that he didn't think the DEA was winning the battle against California's marijuana cultivators.

About a month later, he was told he was going to Afghanistan, although he'd requested to go elsewhere.

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Agents say DEA is forcing them illegally to work in Afghanistan

Afghan drug trade thrives with help, and neglect, of officials

Why secretly funded DEA surveillance planes aren't flying

DEA has 106 planes, so why did it charter private jet for chief?

Follow the latest politics news at McClatchy's Planet Washington

McClatchy Newspapers 2009

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service