• Posted on Monday, May 18, 2009
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

Commentary: Liberty City case sets low standard for preemptive arrest

email this story print this story jump to comments

This editorial appeared in The Miami Herald.

For FBI, U.S. prosecutors and others looking for convictions in the trial of six Miami men accused of plotting terrorism, the third time was, if not a charm, at least sufficient. Five of the six men charged in an al Qaeda terror plot were convicted last week in the sting operation. Though satisfying for the law-enforcement agencies and the federal government, which trumpeted the arrests as an example of stopping terrorists before they strike, the case raises concern about the fairness of the trial and sets a low standard for preemptive arrests.

Defense lawyers believe a juror who disagreed with the jury-panel majority should not have been removed from the trial. They are fighting an uphill battle in trying to persuade U.S. District Judge Joan Lenard, who dismissed the juror, to grant a retrial.

Nevertheless, their contention raises a fundamental issue – whether the trial was fair – that can be grounds for a constitutional challenge on appeal.

From the start, this case was played out in a charged political environment. Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said the arrests of seven Liberty City men showed the government's ability to make an early strike against homegrown terrorists. FBI director Robert Mueller made television appearances touting the preemptive strategy.

If the expectations were that the FBI would monitor suspect groups, eavesdrop on their conversations, surveil their activities and stop them before they acted, this is not exactly what happened with the Liberty City group. The FBI used informants to infiltrate the group, and paid them $140,000 for their work. Until the informants arrived, the group seemed more hapless than threatening. They had no weapons, no plans and frequently asked the informants for money. The informants prodded the men and asked them to swear allegiance to al Qaeda – and they did. This wasn't so much a case of the FBI interrupting an ongoing terror plot, but of the agency providing a blueprint for it.

To read the complete editorial, visit The Miami Herald.

  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here
JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

Stay Connected

Sign up for email newsletters RSS
Follow us on your iPhone Follow us on your Android device
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us using Google Currents

FEATURED COLUMNIST

leonard pitts jr.

Miami Herald columnist Leonard Pitts Jr. won the Pulitzer Prize for commentary in 2004. He is the author of the Novel, Before I Forget. Read his latest commentary here.

COMMENTARY AROUND MCCLATCHY

FEATURED COLUMNIST

joe galloway

McClatchy's veteran war correspondent, Joseph L. Galloway, retired in January 2010 after half a century in the newspaper business. Read his farewell column, and an archive of his take-no-prisoners commentary. Here's one of his most-requested columns, "Fridays at the Pentagon."