S.C. politicians team up to end run governor on stimulus

McClatchy NewspapersJanuary 30, 2009 

WASHINGTON — South Carolina's Republican governor, Mark Sanford, may be a opposed to his state taking its share of federal stimulus spending, but House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn, a South Carolina Democrat, has taken steps to make sure Sanford's opposition won't stop the spending.

Just before the House passed President Obama’s $819 billion economic-stimulus bill Wednesday evening, Clyburn quietly inserted an amendment empowering state legislative leaders to accept the special federal aid if the governor fails to act within 45 days of the measure’s enactment.

A General Assembly vote wouldn't be required — merely "a statement submitted by its leadership," according to Clyburn’s amendment.

South Carolina Speaker Bobby Harrell and Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell, both Republicans, have said they support the $480 million in the stimulus plan to repair the state’s roads, bridges and other infrastructure is needed, but they expressed concerns about other aid.

The stimulus measure would deliver at least $3.2 billion to South Carolina, but it faces hurdles in the Senate and could undergo significant changes.

Sen. Jim DeMint said Thursday he will help lead Senate opposition to the stimulus plan — and hopes to stir the kind of national outcry he galvanized in summer 2007 to defeat immigration reforms.

Separate Clyburn provisions increase stimulus funding to the nation's poorest counties and boost aid to historically black colleges and universities.

Clyburn’s imprint on the economic-recovery package -- and his ability to deliver on longstanding commitments to the rural poor -- show how his post as the No. 3 House leader has bolstered his clout with a larger Democratic majority and election of the first black president.

Clyburn said he became alarmed about Sanford's potential blocking of the state's stimulus money after learning of Sanford's confrontation with Obama last month in Philadelphia at a meeting the then-president-elect had with the nation's governors.

"I happen to know that …a lot of constituents of mine need this kind of assistance," Clyburn said. "Some of the counties that I represent — Marion County, Williamsburg County — that have been in double-digit unemployment since I came to Congress, they are being hit even harder now during an economic recession."

Sanford, who is chairman of the Republican Governors Association, wrote Obama a follow-up letter detailing his opposition to using more federal deficit spending to revive the economy.

Sanford and Texas Gov. Rick Perry expressed their objections to a major stimulus package — which would follow a $700 billion bailout of banks and investment firms — in a column in the Wall Street Journal.

Joel Sawyer, a Sanford spokesman, said the governor shouldn’t be cut out of the decision-making process.

"We think the chief executive of every state should be involved" in deciding whether and how the federal money is spent, Sawyer said.

"Our objection continues to be that none of what is contemplated in the bailout is being paid for with real money," he said.

Clyburn made it clear his provision was aimed squarely at Sanford.

"Our governor has repeatedly expressed political and philosophical aversion to using federal assistance as we work our way out of the economic conditions that are visiting significant difficulties upon businesses and families throughout our beloved state," Clyburn said after the House vote.

"The leadership of the South Carolina General Assembly sees it differently, and I have worked with them to ensure that South Carolinians receive the benefits of these investments," Clyburn said.

Harrell and McConnell said they think the South Carolina share of stimulus money for road, bridge and other infrastructure repairs – about $480 million – is badly needed.

“This state would be foolish to refuse that,” McConnell said.

But they expressed concerns that the stimulus aid would expand state programs, with federal funds drying up in subsequent years.

McConnell and Harrell also question using a federal infusion of $905 million in the stimulus bill to eliminate the state government deficit.

"The speaker has some concerns about using one-time money for recurring state budget costs, but on the matter of infrastructure needs – yes, the speaker, if need be, would request South Carolina's share of the stimulus money," said Greg Foster, a Harrell spokesman.

Clyburn crafted a separate clause in the 647-page stimulus bill, requiring that at least 10 percent of all rural-development funds go to the poorest counties – those in which one-fifth or more of the residents have lived at or below the federal poverty level for at least 30 years.

Twelve counties in South Carolina currently meet Clyburn’s standard: Allendale, Hampton, Jasper, Colleton, Bamberg, Orangeburg, Clarendon, Lee, Williamsburg, Marion, Dillon and Marlboro.

A third Clyburn provision in the House stimulus measure boosts funding for historical-preservation projects at historically black colleges and universities, and removes a local-match requirement, as long as the work has begun or is ready to start.

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service