• Posted on Tuesday, January 27, 2009
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

Obama urges Dems to dump family planning from stimulus

Sign up for email newsletters now!

Sign up for email newsletters now!

Never miss a McClatchy story

More on this Story

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is urging congressional Democrats to drop a proposal to spend money on family planning from the proposed $825 billion package to stimulate the economy, a symbolic gesture that could help him make inroads into Republican ranks.

Obama stood fast with Democrats on Tuesday on the vast majority of their proposal as it heads to the House of Representatives for a vote Wednesday. However, he signaled that the House vote is just the opening salvo of what will be a weeks-long negotiation and that he's open to more concessions.

With the move to drop the controversial family-planning money from the stimulus package — as well as cordial lunch meetings at the Capitol with Republicans — Obama started selling himself to the opposition party as a good cop to the bad cop of congressional Democratic leaders such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

"The key right now is to make sure that we keep politics to a minimum," Obama said as he traveled between his Capitol meetings. "There are some legitimate philosophical differences with parts of my plan that the Republicans have, and I respect that. . . . I don't expect 100 percent agreement from my Republican colleagues, but I do hope that we can all put politics aside and do the American people's business right now."

Republicans were pleased with the outreach from the Democratic president, comparing it favorably with what they say is the cold shoulder they've received from Democrats who are running Congress.

"We are grateful," said Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind. "House Democrats have completely ignored President Obama's call for bipartisan compromise."

House Democrats plan to pass their $825 billion proposal as early as Wednesday, perhaps without making any Obama-urged concessions to the Republicans. Changes still could be made in the Senate, however, and in negotiations between the House and Senate, a point Obama pressed.

"He wants to keep the dialogue open with the GOP," said Steven Schier, a political scientist at Carleton College in Minnesota. "Pelosi is a hardened partisan. Obama is trying to separate his persona from hers."

In a separate opening, Obama personally urged House Democrats on Monday evening to drop the family planning proposal.

"While he believed that the policy of increased funding for family planning was the right one . . . he didn't believe that this bill was the vehicle to make that happen," White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said.

Indeed, the Democratic proposal had become a symbol of complaints about spending in the plan.

"How can you spend hundreds of millions of dollars on contraceptives? How does that stimulate the economy?" an incredulous Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, his party's leader in the House, asked after a meeting Friday with Obama at the White House.

Boehner was pointing to a proposal in the bill to expand Medicaid family-planning services. Republicans said the proposal would make taxpayer-financed family-planning services, including contraceptives, available to those who don't qualify for the help now under Medicaid.

Pelosi appeared to sidestep the question when she was pressed over the weekend to explain how family-planning money would boost the economy or create jobs.

"Well, the family-planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost," she said on ABC.

Appearing on MSNBC on Tuesday, Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., a top Pelosi ally, said that it would be fine for the Senate to drop the family planning proposal, but suggested that House Democrats could ignore the Republican complaint.

"The point is that in the House, the size of the majority and the unwillingness of the House Republicans really to be for anything, frankly, at this point, it shouldn't give them an amount of weight," he said.

Feeding the notion that Obama is maneuvering between the left and right, some liberal bloggers complained Tuesday about jettisoning the family planning proposal.

"Is the Obama administration caving to the right on the family planning provision in stimulus bill?" asked the headline on the liberal blog Thinkprogress.org.

The liberal blog Dailykos.com called it a wasted attempt at bipartisanship, arguing that Republicans never will support the overall proposal anyway.

Said influential liberal blogger Markos Moulitsas Zuniga:

"If Republicans won't play, why should Democrats water down the stimulus to the point of ineffectiveness and cave to ridiculous ideological demands like the family planning stuff when they won't get their cherished `bipartisanship' anyway?"

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Pitts: Limbaugh's a clown. Here's wishing him the worst

Obama's first days: Dramatic actions with a lawyer's caution

With Mitchell off to Mideast, Obama talks to Arab TV

After 48 years, forgiveness for a bus station racial attack

McClatchy Newspapers 2008
JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

ECONOMY IN TURMOIL

economy in turmoil

Read McClatchy coverage of the economic pain Americans around the country are feeling, from Florida to California to Alaska.

ECONOMY QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

 hall & pugh

McClatchy correspondents Kevin G. Hall (left) and Tony Pugh are available to answer your questions about the economic meltdown at home and abroad, and what's in store for ordinary Americans.

Q&A: THE HOUSING CRISIS

Mark Zandi, the chief economist for Moody's Economy.com, is took questions from McClatchy readers about the nation's deep housing crisis. His book, "Financial Shock," offers a 360-degree look at what caused the crisis, what mistakes were made and who made them. It offers a way forward to prevent future crises.

Q&A: TERMINAL CHAOS

U.S. air travel these days is about as fun as a trip to the dentist. Departure delays are rampant, bags often miss the flight you've caught and rising jet fuel prices have major airlines charging to check a bag. In his new book "Terminal Chaos," George Donohue, a professor and former high-level Federal Aviation Administration official, explains why our system of air travel is broken and what can be done to fix it. Read the responses.

Q&A: THE THREE TRILLION DOLLAR WAR

For two weeks, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz and Harvard professor Linda Bilmes, authors of "The Three Trillion Dollar War," fielded questions about the cost of the Iraq war and its impact on the U.S. economy. They're not taking new questions, but they're still posting answers to ones they've already received. Read their responses.

_