• Posted on Friday, December 19, 2008
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

Utilities seek stimulus money to improve energy efficiency

Sign up for email newsletters now!

Sign up for email newsletters now!

Never miss a McClatchy story

WASHINGTON — A utility association that represents 70 percent of the U.S. power industry joined environmental and energy groups Friday in calling on Congress and the new administration to jump-start the economy by helping Americans save energy.

The groups suggest that any economic recovery package Congress passes early next year include $33 billion that mostly would go to state and local governments for programs such as weatherizing houses, schools, businesses and government buildings. To get some of the money, states would have to agree to follow the lead of Idaho, California and other states and let public utilities make money on efficiency investments.

"In our industry, energy efficiency is now a core business," as important as building power plants and transmission lines, said Tom Kuhn, the president of the Edison Electric Institute, an association of the nation's shareholder-owned electric companies, which joined in making the recommendations.

Energy experts say that saving energy is the quickest, cleanest and cheapest way to add to energy supplies and reduce global warming. For utilities, improved efficiency is a less expensive way to make more energy available than building new plants is.

Kuhn's organization joined with the environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council last month in calling for regulatory changes nationwide that would allow utilities to charge ratepayers for investments in energy efficiency. Friday's proposal would require states to make those changes in order to qualify for some of the federal money that the groups want to see spent on energy savings in buildings. Congress is expected to debate a stimulus plan early next month.

The investments that utilities make include such things as installing programmable thermostats or "smart meters" that show residents how much electricity they're using and how much it costs at any given time. Utilities also would be allowed to adjust rates so that they don't lose money from selling less electricity.

Some states already have incentives, but Kuhn's group wants them spread nationally so that energy-efficient buildings become as common as recycling bottles and newspapers is today, he said.

New technology makes it possible to save energy without sacrificing comfort, Kuhn said. Utilities, he added, can improve efficiency on such a large scale that the costs are reduced and the savings are significant.

The United States is the largest energy user in the world and the least efficient one among developed countries, said Kateri Callahan of the Alliance to Save Energy.

She said that the recommendations to spend federal money on efficiency projects would create tens of thousands of construction jobs, lower monthly power bills and help build a more sustainable energy system.

They'd also reduce greenhouse gases by the amount that Germany produces annually, said Peter Lehner, the executive director of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

There's a "tremendous backlog" of energy savings available, and the return on efficiency investments will be paid "many times over" to Americans, Lehner said.

Even California, where energy use is 40 percent less than the national average, "has really only begun to scratch the surface of energy efficiency," he said.

ON THE WEB

A summary of the groups' recommendations

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Bush auto bailout requires worker wage concessions

Stimulus plan could be mother of all 'Christmas tree' bills

Utah leases could be early issue for new Interior chief

McClatchy Newspapers 2008
JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

ECONOMY IN TURMOIL

economy in turmoil

Read McClatchy coverage of the economic pain Americans around the country are feeling, from Florida to California to Alaska.

ECONOMY QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

 hall & pugh

McClatchy correspondents Kevin G. Hall (left) and Tony Pugh are available to answer your questions about the economic meltdown at home and abroad, and what's in store for ordinary Americans.

Q&A: THE HOUSING CRISIS

Mark Zandi, the chief economist for Moody's Economy.com, is took questions from McClatchy readers about the nation's deep housing crisis. His book, "Financial Shock," offers a 360-degree look at what caused the crisis, what mistakes were made and who made them. It offers a way forward to prevent future crises.

Q&A: TERMINAL CHAOS

U.S. air travel these days is about as fun as a trip to the dentist. Departure delays are rampant, bags often miss the flight you've caught and rising jet fuel prices have major airlines charging to check a bag. In his new book "Terminal Chaos," George Donohue, a professor and former high-level Federal Aviation Administration official, explains why our system of air travel is broken and what can be done to fix it. Read the responses.

Q&A: THE THREE TRILLION DOLLAR WAR

For two weeks, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz and Harvard professor Linda Bilmes, authors of "The Three Trillion Dollar War," fielded questions about the cost of the Iraq war and its impact on the U.S. economy. They're not taking new questions, but they're still posting answers to ones they've already received. Read their responses.

_