Some answers about complicated Wall Street rescue plan
By Kevin G. Hall | McClatchy Newspapers
WASHINGTON - Few actions taken by Congress have been as complicated as the proposed $700 billion rescue of Wall Street. Here's a closer look at how it would work.
Q: Is Congress writing a $700 billion check to Wall Street?
A: No. The money will be disbursed in installments. Treasury will get $250 billion to immediately begin buying the bad assets. Another $100 billion can be obtained with a report to Congress on the need for it, and the remaining $350 billion will be released only upon congressional action.
Q: How will Treasury determine what these bad assets are worth?
A: It will be done through a reverse auction process, meaning the government asks holders of these bad assets to determine what price they want for these distressed mortgage bonds and other similar esoteric debt instruments. The idea is that companies will compete with each other to dump these assets at a low price, effectively bidding each other down. Details remain sketchy, but it appears that Treasury will have the authority to buy some of these problem assets directly from companies that have been taken over by government, like insurer American International Group, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Q: Will Treasury have a free hand to do whatever it feels?
A: The legislation would create an oversight commission, comprised of an equal number of Democrats and Republicans. Language in the compromise also creates judicial review mechanisms, addressing concerns about the unprecedented administrative powers sought by the Bush administration. If the upfront costs aren't recaptured within five years, the president will have to put forth a proposal to recoup the spending from the financial sector.
Q: What will this do to our national debt?
A: The rescue plan is being portrayed as an investment, not a traditional expenditure such as funding the Iraq war. The government is purchasing bonds that carry a hold-to-maturity value. As such, assuming the country doesn't fall into a Great Depression that completely wipes out home values, these assets could see their value grow, lessening the ultimate cost to the taxpayers. As the assets are sold off, there is more revenue coming back to federal coffers and would reduce the need for government borrowing. But over a shorter horizon, these loans do add to the nation's mounting debt.
Q: Will the Wall Street fat cats be able to collect big paychecks and taxpayer help?
A: The final proposal stipulates that there will be no golden parachute for executives whose companies are taken over by the government. The Treasury secretary has a free hand there to limit CEO pay. Companies that tender $300 million in their bad debt to the government in the reverse auction process would also lose their ability to deduct from taxes the executive compensation they pay above the $500,000 to their five highest-ranking executives.
Q: Do Americans have a financial stake in the outcome?
A: The proposed legislation provides for stock warrants in those cases where the government has taken over a troubled financial institution. These warrants are designed to put taxpayers at the front of the line if there's a windfall from the intervention. Treasury will have discretion to seek similar warrants from companies in the reverse auction process.
To ask a question about this story or any economic question, go to McClatchy's economy Q&A.
McClatchy Newspapers 2008
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules.
Comments are displayed newest first. If you would like to read a thread from beginning to end, select "Oldest first" from the drop down menu.
@Nyx.CommentBody@