Widening federal deficit looms over stimulus talks

McClatchy NewspapersJanuary 23, 2008 

WASHINGTON — As the Bush administration and Congress try to craft an economic stimulus plan, a dark cloud hangs over them: the federal deficit.

Iraq war costs of $9.6 billion a month and a gaping federal deficit that's funded by borrowing from foreign governments limit how aggressively the U.S. government can cut taxes or boost spending to fend off a recession.

Just over the horizon, a fiscal crisis that some call a day of reckoning looms larger.

Statistics released Wednesday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office show that the federal deficit — the gap between what the government spends and the revenue it collects — is projected to leap to $250 billion in the current budget year. That's up 53 percent from the $163 billion deficit in fiscal 2007.

If Congress approves the roughly $140 billion economic stimulus plan now being discussed, the deficit for the current 2008 fiscal year, which began last Oct. 1, could swell to almost $400 billion.

The CBO presented those estimates to Congress on Wednesday as part of its budget and economic outlook for 2008 to 2018.

"Ongoing increases in health care costs, along with the aging of the population, are expected to put substantial pressure on the budget in coming decades," Director Peter Orszag told the House Budget Committee. "Those trends are already evident in the current projection period."

Lawmakers can sharply cut government spending, sharply raise taxes or pass some combination of spending cuts and tax increases, Orszag said.

The Bush administration frequently notes that although the deficit is high, it's low in historical terms as a percentage of the total economy — 1.5 percent this budget year, according to CBO estimates.

That's true. But it's a snapshot of the moment. Seen in the context of what lies ahead, the deficit puts the U.S. economy on a weaker footing to address the fiscal challenges that successive Congresses have ducked.

Comptroller General David Walker, the chief auditor of the government's balance sheet, has all but shouted from the rooftop that the U.S. government had more than $50 trillion in unfunded liabilities at the close of 2006, compared with $20 trillion in 2000. That number is the sum of everything the government has promised to pay in the future, from pensions and government health care to interest on the debt.

The liabilities now amount to about $170,000 per person or $440,000 per U.S. household, according to Walker. The largest drivers of this trend are big entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, the government insurance program for the elderly. These programs will come under even more strain when the first baby boomers — Americans born between 1946 and 1964 — reach official retirement age in two years.

Some economists believe that to avoid passing the fiscal burden to future generations of Americans, lawmakers and President Bush should propose ways to pay for the stimulus — a combination of tax rebates for consumers and tax relief for business — over a longer time frame.

"If we do something right now like a tax rebate and a couple of other things, it would be sensible to pay for it over a five-year period or something like that," said Alice Rivlin, a former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve who's now a senior researcher at the Brookings Institution, a center-left policy research organization.

While supportive of a short-term stimulus, Rivlin said that long-term challenges must be considered.

"In the long run, we are in serious deficit trouble, and the long run is not so long anymore," said Rivlin, who was the director of the Congressional Budget Office from 1975 to 1983. "We have just made too many promises under our entitlement programs, and we're going to have to change course."

Earlier this month, the rating agency Moody's Investors Service warned that if Congress didn't address the expected budget strains associated with Social Security and Medicare, U.S. government bonds could lose their AAA rating. Investors then would demand higher interest rates to reflect a greater risk of a U.S. government default on its debt obligations, further eroding the nation's fiscal outlook.

But the negotiations between Bush and Congress on the stimulus package include little discussion about how to pay for it.

"It's not just about the size — what you do does matter," said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former CBO director who's an economic adviser to GOP presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

Democrats and Republicans alike suggest that a temporary economic spark prompted by the right kind of stimulus should produce tax revenues to replace what the Treasury is losing.

They're right. But only if the U.S. economy doesn't fall into a recession before the stimulus takes effect. If recession strikes, there would be even less incoming revenue and a bigger federal deficit.

"While much attention will be paid in the coming weeks to the contours of a fiscal stimulus bill, no one should overlook the implication of today's report by the Congressional Budget Office that we are heading into the baby boomers' retirement years in a position of fiscal weakness," said Robert Bixby, the head of the Concord Coalition, a budget watchdog group, in a statement Wednesday.

ON THE WEB

The CBO's budget report.

The comptroller general's views on future liabilities.

McClatchy Newspapers 2008

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service