Democratic candidates on the Iraq pull-out

McClatchy NewspapersAugust 19, 2007 

DES MOINES — Listen to a Democratic presidential candidate talk about Iraq and you'll likely get the bumper-sticker promise to end the war: U.S. troops out, war over.

But most of them don't really believe it should be that neat and simple. What they seldom emphasize as they court anti-war primary voters is that they'd leave at least some U.S. troops — perhaps tens of thousands — in Iraq, or nearby, indefinitely, perhaps for years.

That fact fueled a clash Sunday during a Democratic debate in the early-voting state of Iowa, providing a rare if vague look at what might happen in Iraq after a Democratic president withdrew U.S. combat forces.

``It's going to be messy,'' said Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois. ``There are no good options.''

The debate underscored a political challenge for the Democrats: how to appeal to primary voters who want desperately to get out of Iraq while not promising a faster or more-complete withdrawal than they think wise.

``It is so important that we not oversell this,'' said Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y.

``It's the purists versus the pragmatists,'' said Dennis Goldford, a political scientist at Drake University, which hosted the 90-minute debate televised nationally on ABC. ``You can't just wave the magic wand and have the U.S. disappear from the area. Yet the Democrats don't stress what they would do because it's a tough sell for a Democratic audience.''

The purist, in Goldford's words, is New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, who's urging a complete withdrawal of all U.S. forces within months.

``We have to get all the troops out, all of them,'' Richardson said. ``Our kids are dying. Our troops have become targets.''

He challenged Clinton and others to say how many troops they'd leave in Iraq. ``Is it 25,000, 50,000, 75,000?'' he asked.

None responded with specific numbers. But most of the candidates — except Richardson, Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio and former Sen. Mike Gravel of Alaska — have said they would leave forces behind to protect the U.S. embassy, launch attacks against terrorists, or train Iraqi forces.

``This war must end, but there's much more at stake as to how it ends,'' said Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del. ``If it ends with this country splintering, we will have, for a generation, our grandchildren engaged in a regional war that will be consequential far beyond Iraq.''

He said he'd keep troops in Iraq to protect civilians. He also wants to separate the three factions of Iraq — Sunnis, Shia and Kurds — and cites as an example the use of U.S. troops in the Balkans to keep warring factions apart there.

``This is going to take awhile,'' Clinton said, dismissing prospects of a quick withdrawal. ``This is going to be very dangerous and very difficult. A lot of people don't like to hear that.''

She didn't say how many troops she'd leave in Iraq.

But she said in a speech this summer that she'd keep U.S. troops there to train Iraqis, might deploy U.S. troops to the Kurdish North and would send special units to attack al-Qaida and other terrorist groups in the region.

Obama also didn't specify how many troops he'd leave there, but has said he would leave ``a limited number'' of troops to ``to engage in counter-terrorism and to continue the training of Iraqi security forces.''

Former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina did not commit during the debate. But in a May speech, he said he'd keep forces close. ``Once we are out of Iraq,'' he said, ``the U.S. must retain sufficient forces in the region to prevent a genocide, deter a regional spillover of the civil war, and prevent an al-Qaida safe haven."

McClatchy Newspapers 2007

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service