Cheney: Records law doesn't affect my office

McClatchy NewspapersJune 21, 2007 

Vice President Dick Cheney.


WASHINGTON — Vice President Dick Cheney and congressional Democrats are sparring over the vice president's refusal to comply with a 2003 presidential executive order that requires all agencies and the executive branch to protect classified material.

The skirmish is the latest in a long battle between Congress and the Bush White House — particularly Cheney's office — over the administration's campaign to expand the powers of the executive branch and increase the amount of information labeled as classified.

In a letter to Cheney Thursday, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D-Calif., questioned "both the legality and wisdom" of the vice president claiming an exemption from the order, noting recent controversies involving members of Cheney's staff and classified information.

Former Cheney Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby was convicted in March of perjury and obstruction of justice in connection with a federal investigation into the identification, in a leak to the media, of CIA undercover operative Valerie Plame.

In May 2006, Leandro Aragoncillo, an aide in the vice president's office, admitted in federal court that he stole classified U.S. intelligence information and passed it on to officials plotting a coup in the Philippines.

"This record does not inspire confidence in how your office handles the nation's most sensitive security information," Waxman wrote. "Indeed, it would appear particularly irresponsible to give an office with your history of security breaches an exemption from the safeguards that apply to all other executive branch officials."

Cheney's office says it's exempt from Bush's executive order because it's not an entity within the executive branch. The order, issued in March 2003, directed all agencies and executive branch offices to report on their classified and non-classified files to the National Archives and Records Administration.

Cheney claims his office is "unique" because it has dual responsibilities in the executive branch and legislative branches. In addition to serving as vice president, Cheney is president of the U.S. Senate.

"I would say that we are confident that we are conducting the office properly and under law," said Megan McGinn, a Cheney spokeswoman.

National Archives officials and Waxman disagree.

They say Cheney and his staff fall under the executive order because of their executive branch business. The Archive's Information Security Oversight Office has been trying to get Cheney to comply with the order since it was denied access to the vice president's office for a routine inspection in 2004.

"According to a letter that the National Archives sent to your staff in June 2006, you asserted that the Office of the Vice President is not an 'entity within the executive branch,' and hence is not subject to presidential executive orders," Waxman wrote. "To my knowledge, this was the first time in the nearly 30-year history of the Information Security Oversight Office that a request for access to conduct a security inspection was denied by a White House office."

Archives officials fired off letters to Cheney's office in June and August 2006 seeking compliance to Bush's order but to no avail. In January 2007, they wrote Attorney General Alberto Gonzales in hopes of getting Cheney to comply. Gonzales has not responded to the letter, according to Waxman's office. Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd told McClatchy the matter is under review.

Meanwhile, Cheney's aides attempted to kill the oversight office.

J. Leonard Williams, director of the oversight office, told Waxman's staffers that Cheney's office urged an interagency committee to abolish the Information Security Oversight Office and eliminate its ability to appeal any dispute to the attorney general.

Archives officials declined to comment on the allegations other than to say they "will continue to be responsive to the concerns of all governmental parties."

McGinn did not respond specifically to Williams' allegations.

McClatchy Newspapers 2007

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service