U.S. quietly increasing back-channel contacts with Iran

McClatchy NewspapersApril 24, 2007 

WASHINGTON—The United States has quietly increased its back-channel diplomatic contacts with Iran in recent months, a sign that those who favor engagement with Tehran have strengthened their hand in the Bush administration, according to U.S. officials.

Using Switzerland as an intermediary, American and Iranian officials have exchanged diplomatic messages on a variety of nuts-and-bolts subjects, including the fate of a U.S. citizen missing in Iran, the future of five Iranian operatives whom American forces seized in Iraq, and old financial and property disputes.

The contacts amount to a shift for the White House, which rebuffed an Iranian offer of wide-ranging talks on Iran's nuclear program, Middle East peace and direct relations after the March 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. Instead of engaging Iran, the White House largely shut down the Swiss channel, which both countries use in the absence of formal diplomatic relations.

"There's no doubt there's more willingness to talk now than there was a few years ago," one State Department official said.

U.S. officials, who discussed the sensitive issue only on the condition of anonymity, cautioned that it doesn't amount to a secret dialogue over the biggest American-Iranian dispute: Iran's uranium-enrichment program, which U.S. officials say is intended to develop a nuclear weapon.

And it's unclear whether the change in the American approach is a long-term shift or a tactic to persuade Iran to attend a regional meeting next week about Iraq's future.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is due to travel to the Egyptian Red Sea resort of Sharm el-Sheik for the meeting of Iraq's neighbors and has urged Iran to send an envoy. It would be a "missed opportunity" for Iran if it didn't show up, she told the Financial Times this week.

Iran has threatened to boycott the session unless the United States releases the five Iranians seized in the northern Iraqi city of Irbil in January. The U.S. military says the five are members of Iran's paramilitary Quds force who were arming factions to fight each other; Iran says they're diplomats. While some State Department officials favor releasing the Iranians, the White House has decided not to do so, at least for now.

In another example of U.S. outreach, Washington has enlisted Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, who has close ties with Iran, to try to convince the Iranians to attend the meeting. Zebari, who's about to travel to Tehran, said in a telephone interview that the United States recognized that, for the violence in Iraq to decline, Iran must be included in the discussions.

"This has nothing to do with the (nuclear) threat," Zebari said. Washington is "doing everything they can to get them to participate."

The U.S. government also has asked Iran repeatedly, via the Swiss, for information about former FBI agent Robert Levinson, who went missing on the Iranian resort island of Kish.

The State Department on Tuesday publicly questioned Iran's claim not to know anything about Levinson's whereabouts. "I would find it surprising, given the nature of the Iranian security apparatus, if they don't have some idea about the comings and goings of foreigners on Kish Island," spokesman Sean McCormack said.

The shift in approaches toward Iran began shortly after the November midterm elections, in which voters rejected Bush's Iraq war policies and handed control of Congress to Democrats.

Before ramping up its diplomacy, the Bush administration took a series of military and diplomatic steps to win more leverage against Iran, which under President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has pursued newly assertive polices in Iraq, Lebanon and elsewhere.

Those steps included sending another American aircraft-carrier strike group to the Persian Gulf, dispatching Patriot missile defenses to Arab allies, arresting the five Iranians and accusing Iran of arming factions in Iraq.

Some Democratic lawmakers and European diplomats had voiced alarm that Bush was contemplating airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, a policy that Vice President Dick Cheney and his allies are said to favor. But that doesn't appear to be the dominant view in the administration right now.

After the U.S. failures in Iraq, "There is a feeling that we can't get Iran wrong," a second State Department official said.

———

(c) 2007, McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Need to map

McClatchy Newspapers 2007

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service